"The action of the nerves," he began eagerly, "is
curiously slow in some people. I had a friend, once, that, if you burnt
him with a red-hot poker, it would take years and years before he felt
it!"
"And if you only pinched him?" queried Sylvie.
"Then it would take ever so much longer, of course. In
fact, I doubt if the man himself would ever feel it, at all. His
grandchildren might."
Sylvie and Bruno - Lewis Carroll
When the impulse to write a blog-post strikes, it lodges itself in the consciousness like a bad tooth and extends in all directions. In this state, nothing irks one as an unfinished thought that presses towards further exploration, while the impulse to post drags the opposite way, i.e., to chronicle whatever is ready, now. Thus, our imagination becomes vulnerable. I think, without sufficient proof, that it is during such vulnerable moments that we feel – without ever admitting to it – as if all the good and evil in the world is flowing through our pen; that our writing is a call to all the good men and women to pick their sides, i.e., to announce their allegiance right here and right now. Thus, our chronicle itself – a result of our primal instinct, strangely, to connect – becomes a gunshot into an already hostile reader group, alerting them to partition, i.e., to divide.
So, how should we write a blog-post? But we should first ask: what should we aim to achieve by plunging our productive, imaginative and vulnerable selves into this strange medium of internet, a medium that forces us to engage in – in Christopher Knight’s words – “immersion without submission”?
That distinction between “immersion” and “submission” fascinates me. It seems to me that our experiences in the blogosphere (that dangerously all-encompassing term) are modulated by where we find ourselves between the two extremes of “immersion” and “submission.” What do these extremes mean to me?
I read blogs, comment on them, but I have this visceral desire to expose the full extent of the raw emotions churning in me, i.e., to submit to the compelling power to express, so others may experience the feeling. In this, my instinct is to experience a blog like watching a well-made film. My desire is to force the blog to let me in, and to inflict on me other people’s experience most unobtrusively, just as the characters in the film unfold the drama and pour out the experience into me.
How good this experience is, is of course determined by how “flat” or “rounded” the characters are (a somewhat pedantic classification, but novel writers, not me, would relate to this analogy) and how self-effacing, how unself-conscious the characters are and how energeic the narrative is.
Carried forward like this, I feel the urgent clarity of the mechanics of the further action; see in my view which lever should be pulled first, what then results and how the world changes; and am frustrated by snail-mail speed of the real world. This I call the experience of someone who is at the “submission” extreme of the blogosphere interaction. Here in lie all those folks who are attracted to the blogosphere’s potential for collaborative action.
On the other extreme is the immersive experience. Simply put, this is the non-fiction counterpart of the “submissive” extreme. Immersive blogging experience is self-consciously deliberate, measured, intellectual, sometimes fully aware that “this is only a blog,” self-segments itself into a familiar taxonomy of politics, law, economics etc., tagging aggressively, and feels no compulsion to take further action. It doesn’t mean they don’t act in some political sense, because after all, the matter of ideas counts too.
Note that I am not casting an aspersion of any inauthenticity in the immersive blogging experience, but the fact is this immersive blogging experience is much closer to the state of the present media analysis: after the fact, not involved in producing anything tangible, not involved in taking tangible part in the supply and demand chain of working men and women’s productivity for the sake of the well-being of people. In other words, the immersive blogging experience is away from the actual production of either tangible goods or the movement of them, but the speak-stuff around them.
Perhaps it is only a demographic thing, or a generational thing but it seems to me that, in spite of their initial propensity to unleash the personal in us, blogs are becoming more and more impersonal.
In other words, to put it in somewhat simplistic terms, we are perhaps witnessing a transition of the blogging experience from that of a wholehearted submission to that of an immersion, perhaps even a disaffected immersion. It is as if those who first instinctively reached out to blog – seeking submissive experience – are, though encouraged that people are reading them, turned off by the anxiety that these readers have nothing much to say in return. That quiet recognition which in an off-line world would bring people closer, turns into a no-comment silence which has a jarring impact in the online world.
But, having written all this, I wonder if these submissive and immersive blogging experiences have anything to do with an individual’s and a nation’s political and cultural condition. Surely at some basic level the answer is yes. In some comment on some blog I was trying to make sense of all this in just that political sense, and thought that, for the present circumstance that we find ourselves in India, perhaps some form of submissive blogging experience is more the pressing need. That makes sense to me, and not just in India.
(C) "a belated 9-11 post"
...It seems to me that these two entities, the desire for the ideal and the longing to be in our own community, are continuously negotiating with one another in a human being throughout the workings of the history.
Posted on September 14, 2006 in My Comments Elsewhere, OlderPosts | Permalink | Comments (0)
Save to del.icio.us